Monday, March 30, 2009

Economist magazine is disappointed in Obama. Blogger not surprised.

"If Obama is not who The Economist thought he was, then the fault lies with The Economist and not Obama. The scales may be falling from their eyes now, but if they had done their jobs a few months ago, it wouldn’t be necessary at all".

Read this interesting account from Hot Air.

H/T Charles Adler via Twitter

1 comment:

JR said...

Indeed. Theentire MSM were so caught up in Obama-mania that they all failed to do their proper due diligence.